Evidence-First Sky Identification

See something strange?
Let's identify it.

Upload a photo or video. Add when and where you saw it, and SkyWatchers checks conventional explanations first — while clearly telling you what can and cannot be verified.

Drop your footage here

or click to upload a photo or video

Fast visual assessment Conventional explanations checked first No false certainty

Tonight's Sky

See visible planets, moon phase, meteor showers, and stargazing conditions personalized to your location.

Recent AI Verdicts

Every submission is cross-referenced against known satellites, aircraft, weather patterns, and more.

Triangle shaped uap
Unresolved — Flagged for Review

Triangle shaped uap

Anomaly: 65/100

The analyzed image presents a luminous triangular anomaly captured via night-vision optics, identified as part of the 2019 USS Russell UAP encounter. The central object displays a well-defined triangular silhouette with high luminance. Scientific evaluation considers both the physical presence of a triangular craft and the optical 'triangular bokeh' effect. This effect occurs when out-of-focus light sources are imaged through a triangular aperture common in some night-vision equipment. The absence of visible propulsion, wings, or standard aviation navigation lights contributes to its classification as a UAP, though the bokeh hypothesis remains a primary conventional explanation for the specific geometry observed. Confidence Notes: Confidence is medium due to the well-documented 'triangular bokeh' theory which provides a plausible conventional explanation for the specific visual data, despite the anomalous context of the original event.

UAP
Unresolved — Flagged for Review

UAP

Anomaly: 48/100

The image displays a solitary, bright, diffuse object situated in a clear blue sky. The object exhibits a highly luminous central core surrounded by a hazy, asymmetrical white aura or plume. There is a lack of discernible aerodynamic features such as wings, tail fins, or visible propulsion systems. However, the image quality is significantly degraded by digital noise and compression artifacts, which suggests a heavy crop from a larger frame or a low-resolution sensor capture. The absence of terrestrial reference points (trees, buildings, horizon) makes determining the object's altitude, size, or velocity impossible. The 'glow' around the central point is characteristic of light scattering through ice crystals or aerosols, often seen with high-altitude weather balloons or rocket exhaust plumes at sunset/sunrise, though the sky here appears to be mid-day blue. Confidence Notes: Confidence is low because the image lacks context, metadata, and sufficient resolution to distinguish between a physical craft, an atmospheric phenomenon, or a digital artifact. The 'smudging' of the object's edges is consistent with motion blur or significant distance.

View all community case files →